module 3.6 - adjust human in the loop implementation

[sgbaird]

I was going to share a human-in-the-loop workflow orchestration example from the robotics microcourse, and noticed a mention of it here:

https://ac-microcourses.readthedocs.io/en/latest/courses/robotics/3.6-solid-sample-transfer.html#error-handling

@task
def notify_operator(task_id):
    print(f"ALERT: Task {task_id} has failed. An operator needs to check the robot.")
    # In a real scenario, this could send an email, SMS, or trigger an alert system
    operator_response = input("Has the issue been resolved? (yes/no): ")
    return operator_response.lower() == "yes"

However, this should be using Prefect's built in functionality and should be adjusted to follow what's shown in https://youtu.be/4tnaL9ts6CQ?si=A9v8bF5LfNFekStB with slack notifications and include a link to that YouTube video.

[SissiFeng]

The screenshot is a modified version. How about it?

[sgbaird]

Nice! Thanks for using the slack webhook. Maybe add an optional comment input from the user? (Just to show that data can be passed from the user back to the orchestrator)

[SissiFeng]

what about the above modification?
Added parse_slack_response function to parse user responses; simulated slack API calls and threaded response handling.

[sgbaird]

Similar, but not quite. The input would be by the user on the Prefect interface, not by replying on slack directly. On slack, they would get a link to the corresponding Prefect run, as shown in https://youtu.be/4tnaL9ts6CQ?si=A9v8bF5LfNFekStB

See

https://github.com/AccelerationConsortium/ac-training-lab/blob/ec10e7b99e6e220d49e5cd00e104c19343595b55/scripts/prefect_scripts/my_gh_sample_transfer_workflow.py#L43-L51

and the corresponding interface (assuming lines 46 and 47 from above are uncommented)

[SissiFeng]

Based on the above I made another change.

[sgbaird]

For clarity, remove the try except and timeout.

Either replace the input validation with pydantic, which is natively supported, or remove. See https://docs.prefect.io/v3/develop/inputs

Then should be good to go

[sgbaird]

Thanks for your work on this. Is there a PR I can review?